The recent financial crisis has raised several questions with respect to the corporate governance of financial institutions. This paper investigates whether risk management-related corporate governance mechanisms, such as for example the presence of a chief risk officer (CRO) in a bank’s executive board and whether the CRO reports to the CEO or directly to the board of directors, are associated with a better bank performance during the financial crisis of 2007/2008. We measure bank performance by buy-and-hold returns and ROE and we control for standard corporate governance variables such as CEO ownership, board size, and board independence.
SIMILAR POSTS
19 July 2021
The link between default and recovery rates: effects on the procyclicality of regulatory capital ratios
BIS Working Papers are written by members of the Monetary and Economic Department of the Bank for International Settlements, and [...]
Credit Risk Scoring Models
Credit scoring models play a fundamental role in the risk management practice at most banks. They are used to quantify [...]
Measuring and Managing Credit and Other Risks
During the last 40 years, risk management has evolved tremendously. The technologies and methodologies to measure risks have reached impressive [...]
