The recent financial crisis has raised several questions with respect to the corporate governance of financial institutions. This paper investigates whether risk management-related corporate governance mechanisms, such as for example the presence of a chief risk officer (CRO) in a bank’s executive board and whether the CRO reports to the CEO or directly to the board of directors, are associated with a better bank performance during the financial crisis of 2007/2008. We measure bank performance by buy-and-hold returns and ROE and we control for standard corporate governance variables such as CEO ownership, board size, and board independence.

SIMILAR POSTS

  • 13 September 2020

    Financial Crisis: Where Did Risk Management Fail?

    The real estate market bubble and the subprime mortgages have been often identified as the causes of the current financial [...]

  • 13 September 2020

    Assessing the Credit Worthiness of Italian SMEs and Mini-bond Issuers

    Abstract A number of innovations have been introduced in the last five years to counter the devastating impact of credit [...]